KRITIČKI PREGLED INTERDISCIPLINARNIH ISTRAŽIVANJA RELIGIJSKE KONVERZIJE: TEORIJSKI I METODOLOŠKI PRISTUPI
Ključne reči:
Konverzija/obracenje, interdisciplinarnost, kriza, naracija, kontekstApstrakt
U ovom tekstu se pruža pregled različitih pristupa interdisciplinarnih istra- živanja religijske konverzije. U prvom delu rada predstavljene su tipologije, modeli i koncepti prisutni u teorijskim postavkama različitih naučnih disciplina koje se bave ovim fenomenom; u drugom delu autor analizira narativni pristup kao ključnu teoretsku i metodološku koncepciju. Autor smatra da potraga za univerzalnom paradigmom predstavlja redukcionistički pristup kako konverziji tako i samoj religiji, jer se ista neodigrava u vakuumu, već u određenom istorijskom, društvenom i religijskom kontekstu. Iz tog razloga autor smatra da je narativno-socijalno-konstrukcionistički pristup najdelotvorniji, jer pruža kontekstualno razumevanje ovog fenomena. U ovom narativnom okviru, konverzija predstavlja dinamičnu biografsku rekonstrukciju i/ili renarativizaciju, novi narativni osvrt na sopstveni život pri čemu konvertit aktivnom naracijom reinterpretira pređašnje doživljaje, kao i svoje samorazumevanje sadašnjeg iskustva. Takođe, autor sagledava odnos konverzije i krize (traume); te načine na koje konverzija pomaže da se u kriznim i traumatičnim situacijama dosegnu pozitivna psihološka stanja.
Reference
Allport, W. Gordon, 1950.The Individual and His Religion.New York: Macmillan.
Austin-Broos, Diane, 2003. "The anthropology of conversion: An introduction" in:The Anthropology of Religious Conversion.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, (eds. Andrew Buckser and Stephen D. Glazier).
Bainbridge, S. William, 1992. "The sociology of conversion" in: Handbook of Religious Conversion.Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press, 178-191. (eds. Newton Malony and Samuel Southard).
Berger, Peter and Luckmann, Thomas, 1966.The Social Construction of Reality.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Buckser, Andrew and Glazier, D. Stephen (eds.) 2003.The Anthropology of Religious Conversion.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham.
Coe, A. George, 1916.The Psychology of Religion.Chicago: University of Chicago.
Duvnjak, Neven, 2001. "Teorijsko-metodološki prijepori u pristupu problemu religijske konverzije", Institut društvenih znanosti "Ivo Pilar", 51-52.
Ganzevoort, R. Ruard, 1994. "Crisis Experience and the Development of Belief and Unbelief" in: Belief and Unbelief. Psychological Perspectives. (J. Corveleyn., D. Hutsebaut (eds.)), Amsterdam: Rodopi, 21-38.
Giordian, Giussepe (ed.)2009. Conversion in the Age of Pluralism.Brill: Leiden.
Gooren, Henri, 2010. Religious Conversion and Disaffiliation: Tracing Patterns of Change in Faith Practices.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heirich, Max, 1977. "Change of Heart: A Test of Some Widely Held Theories of Religious Conversion,",American Sociological Review 83: 653-680.
James, William, 1990.Raznolikosti religioznog iskustva, Zagreb: Naprijed.
Jerotić, Vladeta, 2004. Mistička stanja-vizije i bolesti, Beograd: Ars Libri. Johnson, Paul, 1959. Psychology of Religion. New York: Abingdon Press.
Kahn, J. Peter and A. L. Green, 2004. "Seeing conversion whole: Testing a model of religious conversion",Pastoral Psychology 52(3): 233-258.
Kilbourne, Brock and Richardson, T. James, 1988. "Paradigm conflict, types of conversion, and conversion theories",Sociological Analysis 50 (1): 1-21.
Klaver, Miranda, 2011. This is my Desire: A Semiotic Perspective on Conversion in an Evangelical Seeker Church and a Pentecostal Church in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kox, Willem, Meeus, Wim, Hart, Harm, 1991. "Religious conversion of adolescents: Testing the Lofland and Stark model of religious conversion,",Sociological Analysis 52.
Kuburić, Zorica i Sremac, Srđan (ur.) 2009.Konverzija i kontekst: Teorijski, metodološki i praktični pristupi religijskoj konverziji, Novi Sad: CEIR.
Lofland, John and Stark, Rodney, 1965. "Becoming a World-saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective", American Sociological Review 30: 862-874.
Lofland, John and Skonovd, Norman, 1981. "Conversion Motifs.",Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 20 (4): 373-385.
Nock,A.D., 1993. Conversion.London: Oxford University Press.
Paloutzian, F. Raymond, 1996. Invitation to the Psychology of Religion.Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Paloutzian, R.F., Richardson, J.T., and Lewis, Rambo, 1999. "Religious conversion and personality change",Journal of Personality, 67: 1047-1079.
Pargament, I. Kenneth,1997. The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Popp-Baier, Ulrike, 2002. "Conversion as a Social Construction: A Narrative Approach to Conversion Research." in: Social Constructionism and Theology. Leiden: Brill, (eds. C.A.M. Hermans, G.Immink, A. De Jong, J. van der Lans), 41-61.
Rambo, R. Lewis, 1993. Understanding Religious Conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Robertson, Roland, 1978. Meaning and Change: Explorations in the Cultural Sociology of Modern Societies.New York: New York University Press.
Schwartz, L. Lita and Kaslow W. Florence, 1979. "Religious cults, the individual and the family", Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 5: 15-26.
Staples, Clifford and Mauss, Armand, 1987. "Conversion or Commitment? A Reassessment of the Snow and Machalek Approach to the Study of Conversion,",Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 26 (2): 133-147.
Starbuck, D. Edwin, 1903. The Psychology of Religion. New York: Scott Publishing Co. Ltd.
Snow, David and Philips L. Cynthia, 1980. "The Lofland-Stark Conversion Model: A Critical Reassessment.",Social Problems 27: 430-437.
Snow, David and Machalek, Richard, 1983. "The Convert as a Social Type" in: Sociological Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 259-289. (ed. Randall Collins).
Snow, David and Machalek, Richard, 1984. "The Sociology of Conversion",Annual Review of Sociology, 10: 167-190.
Spilka, Bernard et.al (eds.)2003. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach.New York: The Guilford Press, (third edition).
Sremac, Srđan, 2007. Fenomenologija konverzije, Novi Sad: CEIR.
Sremac, Srđan, 2009. "Socijalna konstrukcija konverzije: primer narativne analize svedočanstva konverzije kod bivših zavisnika" Konverzija i kontekst, Novi Sad: CEIR, 75-103. (ur. Zorica Kuburić i Sremac, Srđan).
Sremac, Srđan, "Testimonio kao umjetnost i strategija narativnog identiteta: Ricouerova hermeneutika svjedočanstva i pitanje konverzije bivših ovisnika", Bogoslovska smotra 81(2), 2011, 377-395.
Streib, Heinz, Hood, W. Raplph Jr, Keller, Barbara, Scöf, Rossina-Martha, Silver, F. Christopher, 2009. Deconversion: Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States. Göttingem: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Stromberg, G. Peter, 1993. Language and Self-Transformation: A Study of the Christian Conversion Narrative.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thumma, Scott, 1991. "Seeking to be Converted: An Examination of Recent Conversion Studies and Theories.", Pastoral Psychology 39: 185-194.
Travisano, V. Richard, 1970. "Alternation and Conversion as Qualitatively Different Transformations." in: Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction. Ginn-Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts, (eds. G P Stone and H A Faberman), 594-606.
Ullman, Chana, 1982. "Cognitive and Emotional Antecedent of Religious Conversion,",Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 183-192.
Van de Kamp, Linda, 2011. Violent Conversion: Brazilian Pentecostalism and the Urban Pioneering of Women in Mozambique. Zutphen: Wöhrmann Print Service.
Wilson, Brian, 1982. Religion in Sociological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yamane, David, 2000. "Narrative and Religious Experience.",Sociology of Religion 61 (2): 171-189.
Zock, Hetty, 2006. "Paradigms in Psychological Conversion Research: Between Social Science and Literally Analysis" in: Paradigms, Poetics and Politics of Conversion.Leuven: Peeters, (eds. Jan N. Bremmer, Wout J. van Bekkum and Arie L. Molendijk), 41-58.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation