A CRITICAL REVIEW OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH OF RELIGIOUS CONVERSION: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
Keywords:
Conversion, Interdisciplinarity, Crisis, Narrative, ContextAbstract
In this text you'll see a review of different approaches to interdisciplinary research of religious conversion. In its first part you'll see the typologies, models and concepts in theoretical postulates of different disciplines which are researching this phenomenon; in its second part, the author analyzes a narrative approach as a key theoretical and methodological concept. The author believes that the search for a universal paradigm represents a reductionistic approach to conversion and to religion, since it is not in vacuum, but in a specific historical, social and religious context. This is the reason for the authors’ point of view that the narrative-social-constructionist approach is the most effective one, because it gives us a contextual understanding of the phenomena. In this narrative, conversion represents dynamic biographical reconstruction and/or re-narrative, new turn on his own life, where a convert in active narration reinterpretes previous events, as well as his own understanding of his experience. The author also looks at the relation between conversion and crisis (trauma); as well as ways that conversion can help to reach positive psychological state in times of crisis and in traumatic situations.
References
Allport, W. Gordon, 1950.The Individual and His Religion.New York: Macmillan.
Austin-Broos, Diane, 2003. "The anthropology of conversion: An introduction" in:The Anthropology of Religious Conversion.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham, (eds. Andrew Buckser and Stephen D. Glazier).
Bainbridge, S. William, 1992. "The sociology of conversion" in: Handbook of Religious Conversion.Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press, 178-191. (eds. Newton Malony and Samuel Southard).
Berger, Peter and Luckmann, Thomas, 1966.The Social Construction of Reality.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Buckser, Andrew and Glazier, D. Stephen (eds.) 2003.The Anthropology of Religious Conversion.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Lanham.
Coe, A. George, 1916.The Psychology of Religion.Chicago: University of Chicago.
Duvnjak, Neven, 2001. "Teorijsko-metodološki prijepori u pristupu problemu religijske konverzije", Institut društvenih znanosti "Ivo Pilar", 51-52.
Ganzevoort, R. Ruard, 1994. "Crisis Experience and the Development of Belief and Unbelief" in: Belief and Unbelief. Psychological Perspectives. (J. Corveleyn., D. Hutsebaut (eds.)), Amsterdam: Rodopi, 21-38.
Giordian, Giussepe (ed.)2009. Conversion in the Age of Pluralism.Brill: Leiden.
Gooren, Henri, 2010. Religious Conversion and Disaffiliation: Tracing Patterns of Change in Faith Practices.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heirich, Max, 1977. "Change of Heart: A Test of Some Widely Held Theories of Religious Conversion,",American Sociological Review 83: 653-680.
James, William, 1990.Raznolikosti religioznog iskustva, Zagreb: Naprijed.
Jerotić, Vladeta, 2004. Mistička stanja-vizije i bolesti, Beograd: Ars Libri. Johnson, Paul, 1959. Psychology of Religion. New York: Abingdon Press.
Kahn, J. Peter and A. L. Green, 2004. "Seeing conversion whole: Testing a model of religious conversion",Pastoral Psychology 52(3): 233-258.
Kilbourne, Brock and Richardson, T. James, 1988. "Paradigm conflict, types of conversion, and conversion theories",Sociological Analysis 50 (1): 1-21.
Klaver, Miranda, 2011. This is my Desire: A Semiotic Perspective on Conversion in an Evangelical Seeker Church and a Pentecostal Church in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Kox, Willem, Meeus, Wim, Hart, Harm, 1991. "Religious conversion of adolescents: Testing the Lofland and Stark model of religious conversion,",Sociological Analysis 52.
Kuburić, Zorica i Sremac, Srđan (ur.) 2009.Konverzija i kontekst: Teorijski, metodološki i praktični pristupi religijskoj konverziji, Novi Sad: CEIR.
Lofland, John and Stark, Rodney, 1965. "Becoming a World-saver: A Theory of Conversion to a Deviant Perspective", American Sociological Review 30: 862-874.
Lofland, John and Skonovd, Norman, 1981. "Conversion Motifs.",Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 20 (4): 373-385.
Nock,A.D., 1993. Conversion.London: Oxford University Press.
Paloutzian, F. Raymond, 1996. Invitation to the Psychology of Religion.Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Paloutzian, R.F., Richardson, J.T., and Lewis, Rambo, 1999. "Religious conversion and personality change",Journal of Personality, 67: 1047-1079.
Pargament, I. Kenneth,1997. The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Popp-Baier, Ulrike, 2002. "Conversion as a Social Construction: A Narrative Approach to Conversion Research." in: Social Constructionism and Theology. Leiden: Brill, (eds. C.A.M. Hermans, G.Immink, A. De Jong, J. van der Lans), 41-61.
Rambo, R. Lewis, 1993. Understanding Religious Conversion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Robertson, Roland, 1978. Meaning and Change: Explorations in the Cultural Sociology of Modern Societies.New York: New York University Press.
Schwartz, L. Lita and Kaslow W. Florence, 1979. "Religious cults, the individual and the family", Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 5: 15-26.
Staples, Clifford and Mauss, Armand, 1987. "Conversion or Commitment? A Reassessment of the Snow and Machalek Approach to the Study of Conversion,",Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 26 (2): 133-147.
Starbuck, D. Edwin, 1903. The Psychology of Religion. New York: Scott Publishing Co. Ltd.
Snow, David and Philips L. Cynthia, 1980. "The Lofland-Stark Conversion Model: A Critical Reassessment.",Social Problems 27: 430-437.
Snow, David and Machalek, Richard, 1983. "The Convert as a Social Type" in: Sociological Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 259-289. (ed. Randall Collins).
Snow, David and Machalek, Richard, 1984. "The Sociology of Conversion",Annual Review of Sociology, 10: 167-190.
Spilka, Bernard et.al (eds.)2003. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach.New York: The Guilford Press, (third edition).
Sremac, Srđan, 2007. Fenomenologija konverzije, Novi Sad: CEIR.
Sremac, Srđan, 2009. "Socijalna konstrukcija konverzije: primer narativne analize svedočanstva konverzije kod bivših zavisnika" Konverzija i kontekst, Novi Sad: CEIR, 75-103. (ur. Zorica Kuburić i Sremac, Srđan).
Sremac, Srđan, "Testimonio kao umjetnost i strategija narativnog identiteta: Ricouerova hermeneutika svjedočanstva i pitanje konverzije bivših ovisnika", Bogoslovska smotra 81(2), 2011, 377-395.
Streib, Heinz, Hood, W. Raplph Jr, Keller, Barbara, Scöf, Rossina-Martha, Silver, F. Christopher, 2009. Deconversion: Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States. Göttingem: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Stromberg, G. Peter, 1993. Language and Self-Transformation: A Study of the Christian Conversion Narrative.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thumma, Scott, 1991. "Seeking to be Converted: An Examination of Recent Conversion Studies and Theories.", Pastoral Psychology 39: 185-194.
Travisano, V. Richard, 1970. "Alternation and Conversion as Qualitatively Different Transformations." in: Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction. Ginn-Blaisdell, Waltham, Massachusetts, (eds. G P Stone and H A Faberman), 594-606.
Ullman, Chana, 1982. "Cognitive and Emotional Antecedent of Religious Conversion,",Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43: 183-192.
Van de Kamp, Linda, 2011. Violent Conversion: Brazilian Pentecostalism and the Urban Pioneering of Women in Mozambique. Zutphen: Wöhrmann Print Service.
Wilson, Brian, 1982. Religion in Sociological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Yamane, David, 2000. "Narrative and Religious Experience.",Sociology of Religion 61 (2): 171-189.
Zock, Hetty, 2006. "Paradigms in Psychological Conversion Research: Between Social Science and Literally Analysis" in: Paradigms, Poetics and Politics of Conversion.Leuven: Peeters, (eds. Jan N. Bremmer, Wout J. van Bekkum and Arie L. Molendijk), 41-58.

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation