Revisiting gender troubles: public discourse analysis on gender-sensitive language in Serbia
Keywords:
gender sensitive language, anthropology of gender, public discourse, cultural communication, Gender equality lawAbstract
In this article, I tackle the phenomenon of ‘moral panic’ related to gender-sensitive language is from the perspective of sociocultural anthropology. Moral panic is embodied in the ways of speaking about gender-sensitive language by various actors, primarily on social media (i.e. Instagram). The basic premise is that the dominant public discourse created around the use of gender-sensitive language is articulated through the metaphor of war and represents the battleground of different ideologies. These ideologies are not only positioned in either of the opposing dichotomies ‘for’ and ‘against’ gender-sensitive language, as is the case in actual wars. The assumed enemy, depending on who is speaking about it, is placed in different tangible but also elusive conceptual and imagined forms (ranging from woman, feminists, the LGBTQIA+ population, to the ‘evil West’ as well as the science itself). Since a significant portion of public debates and discourse creation takes place in the media, (i.e. on the Internet), I analyze public statements in the form of discussions and comments on news and social platforms, by treating them as existing entities in the global world, as well as social media as ‘extensions’ of the self. The work aims to explore and clarify cultural communication
that occurs in electronic formats on social media platforms through discourse analysis, referencing the general state of society, as well as the growing popularity of pseudoscientific tendencies.
References
Antonijević, Dragana i Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2021. „Samo sapun Srbina spasava – humorističke po(r)uke o higijeni tokom Kovid-19 pandemije u Srbiji”, Savremena srpska folkloristika IX: 397–418.
Aouragh, Miriyam. 2018. „Digital Anthropology”, u: The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Banić Grubišić, Ana. 2023. Internet mimovi između folklora i popularne kulture. Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Dosije studio: Beograd.
Bauman, Richard. 2008. „Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative”, Cambridge Studies in Oral and Literate Culture (10). New York: Cambridge University Press, x – 130.
Bucholtz, Mary i Hall, Kira. 2004. „Language and Identity”, u: ed. Duranti Alessandro, A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Blackwell Publishing LTD: 369–394.
Burr, Vivien. 2003. Social Constructionism, London: Routledge.
Garland, David. 2008. „On the concept of moral panic”, Crime media culture, SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore: 9–30.
Goode, Erich i Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 1994. „Moral panics: Culture, politics and social construction”, Annual Review of Sociology 20 (1994): 149–17.
Cohen, Stanley. 1972. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Drezgić, Rada. 2008. „Od planiranja porodice do populacione politike – promena vladajuće paradigme u srpskoj demografiji krajem 20. veka”, Filozofija i društvo 3/2008: 181–215.
Drezgić, Rada. 2010. Bela kuga medju „Srbima”: o naciji, rodu i radjanju na prelazu vekova, Beograd: Albatros plus.
Ćuković, Jelena. 2019. Nematerijalno kulturno nasleđe iz antropološke perspektive. Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Dosije studio: Beograd.
Ćuković, Jelena. 2023. Diskursi kulturnog nasleđa u Vojvodini. Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Dosije studio: Beograd.
Leach, Edmund. 1976. Culture and communication: The logic by which symbols are connected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milenković, Miloš. 2024. Cultural Heritage and Reconciliation in the Western Balkans: An Anthropological Perspective, Routledge: New York.

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation