FEMINIST UNDERSTANDINGS OF SURROGACY
Keywords:
surrogate motherhood, exploitation, choice, parenthood, patriarchyAbstract
Like prostitution, pornography, and the like, and surrogate maternity is a question which divides feminist movement. Liberal feminism, supporting surrogate motherhood, emphasizes, above all, the question of choice. According to this concept, a woman can choose whether she will give birth to a child, and in accordance with the regulation of surrogacy, she may receive a certain amount of money for this (Imrie, Jadva, 2014). On the other hand, radical and part of left-oriented feminists take into account not only choices, but also the material conditions that condition and/or limit them. Starting from this assumption, as well as from the general criticism of the control and appropriation of women’s reproducibility and sexuality, they see in the surrogate motherhood another type of exploitation of the female body. Since the mother surrogate is usually from the lowest class, it is precisely in this practice that the actions of the capitalist patriarchy and the double oppression of women from marginalized groups are evident. Because of this, Renata Klein, a feminist who opposes the surrogacy, calls this a reproductive prostitution (Klein, 2017). However, this is not a universal view of all left-wing feminists – some of them see surrogacy as a work that needs to be regulated by law, and a surrogate mother as a worker whose rights need to be promoted (Lewis, 2019).
My basic thesis is that surrogacy is not only a basic exploitative practice that mostly affects women from the poorest and most marginalized social groups, but also that it is related to other forms of appropriation and control of female reproduction, and endangering the right to bodily autonomy through the creation of legislative frameworks which, reduced to the level of social reality, means a proprietary relationship to the female body. In other words, surrogacy is seen in the context of strengthening rightwing forces in Europe and the world that abolish and/or restrict already won women’s rights, such as the right to abortion, which also invoke similar values advocated by feminists who support surrogacy, such as the right to biological parenthood or the right of embryo.
References
Aigen. Betsy P.1996. Motivations of Surrogate Mothers: Parenthood, altruism and self-actualization. The American Surrogacy Center Inc. Marietta, GA.
Akker. Van den. B.A. Olga. 2007. Psychosocial aspects of surrogate Motherhood. In Human Reproduction Update 13 (1). 53–62.
Allen. Anita L. 1991. The Socio-Economic Struggle for Equality: The Black Surrogate Mother. U Harvard BlackLetter Journal 17
Allis. Trevor. 1995. The moral implications of motherhood by hire. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 5
Berkhout. Suze. 2008. Buns in the oven: Objectification, surrogacy, and women’s autonomy. Social Theory and Practice 34 (1) 95–117.
Chesler. Phyllis. 1988. Sacred Bond: The legacy of Baby M. Vintage Books, New York.
Ciccarelli, Janice C. Beckman. Linda J. 2005. Navigating rough waters: An overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. U Journal of Social Issues 61 (1) 21–43.
Corea. Gena. 1985. The Mother Machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. New York: HarperCollins.
Dworkin. Andrea. 1983. The Right Wing Women. New York: Perigee Books.
Edelmann. Robert J. 2004. Surrogacy: The psychological issues. U Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 22 (2) 123–136.
Dzau. Victor J. Balatbat. Celynne A. 2018. Health and societal implications of medical and technological advances. U Science Translational Medicine Vol. 10
Ekman. Kajsa Ekis. 2013. Being and Being bought: Prostitution, Surrogacy and the Split Self. North Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
Ertman. Martha M. 2008. What’s wrong with a parenthood market? U The Reproductive Rights Reader: The construction of motherhood. Uredila Nancy Ehrenreich New York University, New York, 299–307.
Etvud. Margaret. 2006. Sluškinjina priča. Beograd: Laguna.
Firestone. Shulamith. 2015. The Dialectic of Sex. London: Verso.
Fuko. Mišel. 2005. Rađanje biopolitike. Novi Sad: Svetovi
Fuko. Mišel. 2009. Rađanje klinike. Novi Sad: Mmedieran Publishing
Hanafin. Hilary. 1987. Surrogate Parenting: Reassessing human bonding. Oklahoma: Center for Surrogate Parenting Inc
Ince. Susan. 1989. Inside the surrogate industry. U Test-Tube Women: What future for motherhood? Uredile Arditti, Rita. Klein. Renate. Minden. Shelley. Pandora Press, Unwin Hyman, London, Winchester, MA and Sydney.
Jaquith. Cindy. 1988. Surrogate Motherhood, Women’s Rights, and the Working Class. New York: Pathfinder Press
Kroløkke. Charlotte Halmø. Pant. Saumya. 2012. “I only need her uterus”: Neo-liberal Discourses on Transnational Surrogacy. U NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research Vol. 20 (4)
Lewis. Sophie. 2019. Full Surrogacy Now. London: Verso.
Oliver. Kelly. 1992. Marxism and surrogacy. U Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics.
Uredile Holmes. Helen Bequaert. Purdy. Laura M. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
Pande. Amrita. 2009. Not an angel, not a whore: Surrogates as “dirty” workers in India, Indian Journal of Gender Studies 16 (2). 141–173.
Raymond. Janice G. 1989. Reproductive technologies, radical feminism, and socialist liberalism. U Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. Journal of International Feminist Analysis (2) 2. 133–142.
Roberts. Dorothy. 2008. Race and the New Reproduction u The Reproductive Rights Reader: Law, Medicine, And The Construction Of Motherhood. Uredila Nancy Ehrenreich New York: New York University
Sekulić. Nada. 2016. Kultura rađanja. Istraživanje o seksualnoj i reproduktivnoj socijalizaciji žena. Beograd: Čigoja.
Shultz. Marjorie M. 1990. Reproductive technology and intent-based parenthood: An opportunity for gender neutrality, dostupno na https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9fb8/d3bb2329fc06f4b9bbc574181d875f7648ce.pdf, pristupljeno 15.5.2020.
Sistare. Christine T. 1994. Reproductive freedom and women’s freedom: Surrogacy and autonomy. U Living with Contradictions: Controversies in feminist social ethics. Uredila Jaggar A.M. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Spar. Debora L. 2006. The Baby Business: How money, science and politics drive the commerce of conception. Watertown, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Trifković. Milijana. Ćurčić. Danilo. Marinković. Milica. Vasiljević. Marko. 2020. Prava drugog reda: Socijalna prava u svetlu mera štednje. Beograd: Inicijativa A11
Vaughan-Brakman, Sarah and Sally J. Scholz. 2006. Adoption, ART, and a re-conception of the maternal body: Toward embodied maternity Hypatia 21 (1) 54–73.
Whitehead. Mary Beth. 1989. A Mother’s Story: The truth about the Baby M case. St. New York: Martin’s Press.
Wilkinson. Stephen. 2003. Bodies for Sale: Ethics and exploitation in the new human body trade. London: Routledge.
Winddance Twine, France. 2012. Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market. France
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/03/how-the-handmaids-tale-dressed-protests-across-the-world, pristupljeno 16.1.2020.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/03/how-the-handmaids-tale-dressed-protests-across-the-world, pristupljeno 16.1.2020.
https://www.circlesurrogacy.com/parents/how-it-works/programs-costs, pristupljeno 16.1.2020.
http://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/430176/Srbija-uvodi-surogat-majke, pristupljeno 10.5.2020
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/parenting/getting-pregnant/commercial-surrogacy-banned-in-india-government-passes-tough-laws/articleshow/70555132.cms, pristupljeno 15.5.2020.
https://www.danas.rs/drustvo/izabrani-slogani-za-podsticaj-radjanja/, pristupljeno 15.5.2020.
https://zeneprotivnasilja.net/vesti/645-komentari-i-predlozi-mreze-zene-protiv-nasilja-na-gradanski-zakonik, pristupljeno 14.5.2020.
https://zeneprotivnasilja.net/vesti/645-komentari-i-predlozi-mreze-zene-protiv-nasilja-na-gradanski-zakonik, pristupljeno 13.5.2020.
https://www.instagram.com/arteggdonation/, pristupljeno 16.1.2020.
https://www.link4med.com/sr/, pristupljeno 16.1.2020.
https://www.facebook.com/medicaltravelinserbia/photos/a.1997053417250142/2399960663626080/?type=3&theater, pristupljeno 16.1.2020.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/07/pregnant-cambodian-women-charged-with-surrogacy-and-human-trafficking, pristupljeno 4.5.2020.
https://www.astra.rs/trgovina-ljudima-u-srbiji/, pristupljeno 4.5.2020.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/12/20/india-bans-commercial-surrogacy-stop-rent-womb-exploitation/, pristupljeno 8.7.2020.

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation