MIND THE GAPS! POLITICS, POWER AND A SPACE FOR ANTHROPOLOGY
Keywords:
power, state, policy, engaged anthropology, public anthropology, pragmatismAbstract
This article is an attempt to think through two kinds of ‘gaps’ that researchers need to deal with. It is argued that what is at stake is much more than a mere conceptual or theoretical issue but one that has implications in the world. The first gap exists between the policies devised by national or supranational authorities and the ‘local level’. How to account for both sides of the ‘gap’ that exists between the policies and the people? I will argue here that it is less helpful to rely on concepts such as ‘the political’ or ‘the state’, but more fruitful to make power a central concern of the analysis. Reaching across pragmatic, methodological and epistemological issues, I would like to take seriously the question whether a ‘"dwelling perspective", [can] be combined with the recognition that human lives are lived collectively within fields of power’ (Ingold 2005a: 501). The other ‘gap’, pointed out at least since the advent of universities in Europe or, perhaps, even since Antiquity, is the one which exists between the academy and the wider world, and which, I would like to suggest, has similar structures of becoming as the first one. The corollary question that is treated in this article is both normative and practical, and regards the use of anthropology in the contemporary world, asking why anthropologists have not been, as could be expected, commentators on pressing social, both local and global issues. I then pose the question whether, and how, anthropology can speak outside of academia, and in how far the structure of academia acts as an impediment with regards to this aim. The paper first offers to deconstruct the assumptions embedded in certain conceptualisations of the state by proposing alternative ways of including the state more usefully in anthropological analysis and ethnography than has been done so far. This is then opened up by a discussion of general interest of what anthropology could be for, concluding, with Gledhill, that ‘we can be active and more engaged participants in the messy intersecting fields of power that we study’ (2004: 38).
References
Abélès, Marc (2005) Anthropologie de l’Etat, Paris, Payot & Rivages.
Abrams, Phillip (2005[1988]) Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State in: Aradhana Sharma (ed) The Anthropology of the State, Oxford, Blackwells, 112-130.
Anderson, Benedict (1983) Imagined Communities: An Inquiry into the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, London, Verso.
Appadurai, Arjun (2000) Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination, Public Culture 12 (1), 1-19.
Aretxaga, Begoña (2003) Maddening States, Annual Review of Anthropology 32, 393- 410.
Axtmann, Roland (2002) What’s Wrong With Cosmopolitan Democracy?, in: Nigel Dower and John Williams (eds), Global Citizenship: A Critical Reader, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 101-113.
Balandier, Georges (1967) Anthropologie politique, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Billig, Michael (2006) Comment on Don Kulick "Theory in Furs: Masochist Anthropology, Current Anthropology 47 (6), 944-945.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, Polity.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time, Cambridge, Polity.
Bourdieu, Pierre (2003) Participant-Objectivation, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (2), 281-294.
Brand, Stewart (1994) How Buildings Learn: What Happens to Them After They’re Built, London, Penguin.
Caplan, Pat (2006) In Search of the Exotic: A Discussion of the BBC2 Series Tribe, Anthropology Today 21 (2), 3-4.
Cox, Robert W. (1981) Social Forces, States and Worlds Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, Millennium Journal of International Studies 10 (2), 126-55.
Cox, Robert W. with Timothy J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
D’Andrade, Roy (1995) Moral Models in Anthropology, Current Anthropology 36 (3), 399-408.
Eriksen, Thomas Hylland (2006) Engaging Anthropology: The Case for a Public Presence, Oxford, Berg.
Fish, Adam & Sarah Evershed (2006) Anthropologists Responding to Anthropological Television: A Responde to Caplan, Huges-Freeland and Singer, Anthropology Today 22 (4), 23-24.
Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge, New York, Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel (1991a) Governmentality, in: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 87-104.
Foucault, Michel (1991b) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London, Penguin.
Gledhill, John (2000) Power And Its Disguises: Anthropological Perspectives on Politics, London, Pluto Press.
Gledhill, John (2004) Beyond Speaking Truth to Power: Anthropological Entanglements with Multicultural and Indigenous Rights Politics, Paper presented to the workshop Pouvoir critique et critique du pouvoir des anthropologues, 8th conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists, Vienna, 8-12 September. Downloaded from http://jg.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/jgepubs.htm
Gramsci, Antonio (2005) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, London, Lawrence & Wishart.
Gupta, Akhil (1995) Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics and the Imagined State, American Ethnologist 22 (2), 375-402.
Gupta, Akhil & James Ferguson (2002) Spatialising States: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality, American Ethnologist 29, 981-1002.
Held, David and Anthony McGrew (2002) (eds.) The Global Transformations Reader, Cambridge, Polity.
Hobbes, Thomas (1999a [1651]) The Misery of the Natural Condition of Mankind [excerpt from Leviathan], in: Michael Rosen & Jonathan Wolf (eds.), Political Thought, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 11- 14.
Hobbes, Thomas (1999b [1651]) Creating Leviathan [excerpt from Leviathan], in: Michael Rosen & Jonathan Wolf (eds.), Political Thought, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 56-58.
Hughes-Freeland, Felicia (2006) Tribes and Tribulations: A Response to Pat Caplan, Anthropology Today 22 (2), 22-23.
Ingold, Tim (2000) Perception of the Environment: Essays in Dwelling, Livelihood and Skill, London, Routledge.
Ingold, Tim (2005a) Towards a Politics of Dwelling, Conservation and Society 3, 2, 501-508.
Kenrick, Justin (2002) Perceptions of Processes in place of the Politics of Categories, Conference Paper given at the Ninth International Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies, University of Edinburgh, 9th–13th September, http://www.abdn.ac.uk/chags9/1kenrick.htm (downloaded 25.04.04)
Kulick, Don Theory in Furs: Masochist Anthropology, Current Anthropology 47 (6), 933-952.
Latour, Bruno (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
Lewellen, Ted C. (2002) Anthropology of Globalization: Cultural Anthropology Enters the 21st Century, Westport, CT, Greenwood.
Mitchell, Timothy (1991) Everyday Metaphors of Power, Theory and Society 19, 545- 577.
Mukhopadhyay, Amites (2005) Negotiating Development: The Nuclear Episode in the Sundarbans of West Bengal, Anthropology Matters 7 (1), 1-17.
Murdock, Donna (2003) That Stubborn ‘Doing Good’ Question: Ethical / Epistemological Concerns in the Study of NGOs, Ethnos 68 (4), 507-532.
Nelson, Diane M. (2005) Life During Wartime: Guatemala, Vitality, Conspiracy, Milieu, in: Jonathan Xavier Inda (ed.) Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality and Life Politics, Oxford, Blackwell, 215-247.
Nugent, David (2004) Governing States, in: David Nugent & Joan Vincent (eds.) A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, Oxford, Blackwell, 198-215.
Nugent, David & Joan Vincent (2004) (eds.) A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, Oxford, Blackwell.
Phillips, Sarah D. (2005) Postsocialism, Governmentality and Subjectivity: An Introduction, Ethnos 70 (4), 437-442.
Pottier, Johan (1999) Anthropology of Food: The Social Dynamics of Food Security, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Rose, Nikolas and Daniel Miller (1992) Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government, British Journal of Sociology 43, 173-205.
Saitta, Dean J. (2006) Higher Education and the Dangerous Professor: Challenges for Anthropology, Anthropology Today 22 (4), 1-3.
Scott, James C. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, London, Yale University Press.
Scott, James C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, London, Yale University Press.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy (1995) The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology, Current Anthropology 36 (3), 409-421.
Singer, André (2006) Tribes and Tribulations: A Response to Hughes-Freeland, Anthropology Today 22 (3), 24.
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken & Marysia Zalewski (eds.) (1996) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Svasek, Maruska (2006) Introduction: Postsocialism and the Politics of Emotion, in: Maruska Svasek (ed.) Postsocialism: Politics and Emotions in Central and Eastern Europe, Oxford, Berghahn, (no page numbers, sourced from manuscript).
Taussig, Michael (1992) The Nervous System, London, Routledge.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph (2001) The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization, Current Anthropology 42 (1), 125-138.
Walker, R.B.J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wikan, Unni (2006) Comment on Don Kulick "Theory in Furs: Masochist Anthropology", Current Anthropology 47 (6), 947-948.
Wolfe, Thomas C. (2000) Cultures and Communities in the Anthropology of Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Annual Review of Anthropology 29, 195-216.
ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation