WHO PAYS THE PRICE OF UNPAID HOUSEHOLD WORK AND WHAT IS THE POSITION OF EUROPEAN AND SERBIAN LEFT ON THAT ISSUE?
Keywords:
gender inequality, unpaid work, care work, economic value, policiesAbstract
The division into "productive" and "reproductive" labor was established by a capitalist system. The mainstream economics recognizes the productive value of market labor, while unpaid domestic work and family care are defined as "reproductive," aimed at the reproduction of the family or at the aggregate level - the population. The inappropriateness of this dichotomy was emphasized by Marxist-oriented feminism and feminist economics. According to these approaches, “reproductive” labor generates economic values and can, be considered “productive”. The paper presents an assessment of the economic value of this labor. This is at the same time the value that women invest in the reproduction of the household/family, in the future labor force and society. It is a value that is appropriated by women and represents a measure of their exploitation in the private sphere, as well as in the public sphere of social reproduction of capitalism. Feminist approaches offer a variety of solutions to this social injustice, from the wage for domestic work to a model of universal care that has also the potential to transform the sphere of paid work and connect the two spheres. The left oriented political parties of the European Parliament recognize the importance of the topic, and have contributed to the adoption of the EU ‘Reconciliation Directive’. This is still far from the transformation gender relations, but it is a step forward. Among the domestic left political parties, awareness of the problem is present in the non-parliamentary Social Democratic Union, which has no influence on official policies.
References
Anderson, M., Bechhofer, F. & J. Gershuny. (eds.) 1994. The Social and Political Economy of the Household, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Babović Marija. 2012. Polazna studija o preduzetništvu žena u Srbiji. Beograd: UN Women. Dostupno na: https://www.secons.net/files/publications/87-publication.pdf
Babović Marija. 2010. Rodne ekonomske nejednakosti u komparativnoj perspektivi: Srbija i Evropska unija. Beograd: ISIFF, SeConS.
Babović, Marija. 2009. „Radne strategije i odnosi u domaćinstvu: Srbija 2003–2007“, u Tomanović, S, Milić, A. (ur.) Porodice u Srbiji danas u komparativnoj perspektivi. Beograd: ISIFF, 135–150.
Babović, Marija. (2006) „Socio-ekonomske strategije i odnosi unutar domaćinstava”, u S. Tomanović, (ur.) Društvo u previranju, Beograd: ISI FF: 81 – 101.
Babović, Marija i Olivera Vuković. 2008. Žene na selu kao pomažući članovi poljoprivrednog domaćinstva: položaj, uloge i socijalna prava. Beograd: UNDP.
Beneria, Lourdes. 1979. Reproduction, production and the sexual division of labor, Cambridge Journal of Ecnomics, 3(3): 203–225.
Chadeau, Ann. (1985). Measuring Household Activities: Some International Comparisons. Income Wealth Review, vol. 31, No. 3 (September), pp. 237–53.
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Work-Life Balance for Parents and Carers and Repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU, dostupno na: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-20–2019-INIT/en/pdf
European Commission, International Monetary Fund, OECD, United Nations and World Bank. 2009. System of National Acounts 2008. New York: EC, IMF, OECD, UN, WB, dostupno na https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Federici, Silvia. 2012. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. Oakland: PM Press
Federici, Silvia. 1975. Wages against housework. London: Power of Women Collective.
Folbre, Nancy. 1994. Who Pazs for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London: Routledge.
Fortunati, Leopoldina, and Jim Fleming. 1995. The arcane of reproduction: housework, prostitution, labor and capital. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Autonomedia.
Fraser, Nancy. 1994. After the Family Wage. Political Theory 22 (4):591–618.
Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella. 1982. Unpaid work in the Household: A review of economic valuation methods. Women, Work and Development, No. 1, International Labour Office, Geneva.
Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament 2018. Sustainable Equalitz. Well-Being for Everyone in a Sustainable Europe. Brussels: European Parliament, dostupno na https://www.progressivesociety.eu/sites/default/files/2018–12/S%26D_ProgressiveSociety-SustainableEquality_BROCHURE_V18_spreadsWEBSITE.pdf
GUE/NGL. 2016. Our Work Zour Voice. The Left in the European Parliament 2014–2016. Brussels: European Parliament, dostupno na https://www.guengl.eu/issues/publications/our-work-your-voice/
Himmelweit, Susan. 1999. Caring Labor. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561: 27–38
Laslett, Barbara and Johanna Brenner. 1989. Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 15: 381–404.
Pigou, Alfred. 2005. The Economics of Welfare, Vol. I. New York: Cosimo Inc.
Republički zavod za statistiku. 2015. Korišćenje vremena u Republici Srbiji 2010. I 2015. godine, Beograd: RZS.
Roberts, Dorothy E. 1997. Spiritual and Menial Housework. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism. Vol. 9: 51–80. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1125&context=yjlf
SeConS. 2018. Evaluacija Akcionog plana za sprovođenje Nacionalne strategije za rodnu ravnopravnost Republike Srbije 2016–2018. Beograd: SeConS.
Socijaldemokratska stranka. 2014. Program Socijaldemokratske stranke. Beograd: SDS, dostupno na http://www.sds-org.rs/fileadmin/user_upload/PROGRAM_SDS_01.10.2014..pdf
Stiglitz, Joseph E., Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fitoussi. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: The Commission. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report
Tilly, Chris and Charles Tilly. 1998. Work Under Capitalism. Boulder Colorado: Westview Press.
Taylor-Gooby, Peter. 1996. “The Response of Government: Fragile Convergence?” in George, V, Taylor-Gooby, P. (eds.) European Welfare Policy: Squaring the Welfare Circle, Macmillan Press: 199–218.
Tilly, Chirs, and Charles Tilly. 1998. Work Under Capitalism, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Tilly, Louise Audino. 1989. Gender, Women’s History, and Social History. Social Science History Vol. 13, Issue 4: 439–462.
Tilly, Louise and Joan Wallach Scott. 1989. Women, Work and Family. New York: Routledge.
UNECE. 2017. Guide on Valuing Unpaid Household Service Work. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Zelleke, Almaz. 2008. Institutionalizing the Universal Caretaker Through a Basic Income?. Basic Income Studies. 3(3), pristupljeno 30. decembra 2019, na https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/bis.2008.3.3/bis.2008.3.3.1133/bis.2008.3.3.1133.pdf

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation