SOCIAL EXCHANGE AND POWER RELATIONS IN JIN PING MEI: AN ANALYSIS OF A CLASSIC CHINESE NOVEL

Authors

  • Vesna Vučinić-Nešković Department of Ethnology and Anthropology Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade

Keywords:

theory of social exchange, power relations, patron-client relations, Chinese literature, Ming dynasty

Abstract

This paper aims to apply the theory of social exchange in the analysis of power relations in the Classic Chinese novel Jin Ping Mei, better know in English as The Golden Lotus, or in a later translation as The Plum in the Golden Vase. Treating the novel as a satirical commentary on the decaying society of the late Ming period, it sets to identify the main dyadic relations between Ximen Qing, a rich and spoiled merchant, and the state officials on different levels of official hierarchy. The novel is rich with minute descriptions of social exchange, i.e. the exchange of valuable goods and coins, favors, and useful information. The analysis shows that each of the three dyadic relationships is specifically determined by the power relationships imbedded in them.

References

Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value. In: The Social Life of Things. Ed. A. Appadurai, 3-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Befu, Harumi. 1966. Gift-giving and Social Reciprocity in Japan. Asia/France-Asie 21.188: 161-77.

Befu, Harumi. 1977. Social Exchange. Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 255-81.

Benedict Ruth. 1946. The Chrysanthemum and the Sword. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Blau, Peter. 1964. Exchange and Power. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dauncy, Sarah. 2003. Bonding, Benevolence, Barter, and Bribery: Images of Female Gift Exchange in the Jin Ping Mei. Nan Nü: Men, Women and Gender in Early and Imperial China 5.2: 203-237.

Egerton, Clement. 1972. The Golden Lotus (Chi’in P’ing Mei), London: Routhledge and Kegan Paul.

Emerson, Richard M. 1962. Power-Dependence Relations. American Sociological Review 27.1: 31-41.

Emerson, Richard M. 1972. Exchange Theory, part II: Exchange Theory and Exchange Networks. In: Sociological Theory in Progress. Ed. J. Berger, M. Zelditch, 2: 58-87. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gernet, Jacques. 1972/1982. A History of Chinese Civilization. Trans. J. R. Foster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodenough, Ward.1970. Describing a Culture: Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gouldner Alvin W. 1960. The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review 25.2: 161-78.

Harris, Marvin. 1976. History and Significance of the Emic/Etic Distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 329–350.

Hucker, Charles O. 1958. Government Organization of the Ming Dynasty. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 21.2: 1-66.

Hucker, Charles O. 1966. The Censorial System of Ming China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Ho, Ping-ti. 1954. The Salt Merchants of Yang-Chou: The Study of Commercial Capitalism in Eighteenth-Century China. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 17.1/2: 130-168.

Hsia C.T. 1980. The Classic Chinese Novel: A Critical Introduction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Kipnis, Andrew B. 1997. Producing Guanxi: Sentiment, Self, and Subculture in a North China Village. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Lebra, Takie Sugiyama. 1975. An Alternative Approach to Reciprocity. American Anthropologist 77.3: 550-565.

Peterson, W. J. 1979. Bitter Gourd: Fang I-chih and Intellectual Change in the 1630s. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Pike, Kenneth Lee (ed.). 1954/1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.

Ricci, Matteo. 1953. China in the Sixteenth Century: The Journals of Metthew Ricci, 1583-1610. Trans. Louis J. Gallagher. New York: Random House.

Sahlins, Marshal D. 1965. On Sociology of Primitive Exchange. In: The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. Ed. M. Banton. New York: Frederick A. Praeger Publ.

Smart, Alan. 1993. Gifts, Bribes, and Guanxi: A Reconsideration of Bourdieu’s Social Capital, Cultural Anthropology 8.3: 388-408.

Volpp, Sophie. 2005. The Gift of a Python Robe: The Circulation of Objects in Jin Ping Mei. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 65.1: 133-58.

Wolf Eric R. 1966. Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in Complex Societies. In: The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies. Ed. M. Banton. New York: Frederick A. Praeger Publ.

Mayfair Mei-hui Yang, 1994. Gifts, Favours and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Yao, Lingshi. 1940. P’ing Wai Wei Yen. Tianjing: Tianjing Shuji.

Yan, Yunxiang. 1996. The Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2012-09-30

How to Cite

Vučinić-Nešković, V. (2012). SOCIAL EXCHANGE AND POWER RELATIONS IN JIN PING MEI: AN ANALYSIS OF A CLASSIC CHINESE NOVEL. Anthropology, 12(2), 243–260. Retrieved from https://www.antropologija.com/index.php/an/article/view/248

Issue

Section

Original scientific paper