(Re)framing contested heritage as shared: a possible scenario
Keywords:
contested heritage, shared heritage, education, youth, Kosovo, 1990s war, reconciliationAbstract
In post-conflict societies, the interpretation of the contested cultural heritage presents a complex challenge. The reason for this is the fact that heritage bearing traces of conflict, division, and denial is often marginalized or instrumentalized in processes of reconstructing social cohesion. Consequently, its role in building collective identity and sustainable peace remains insufficiently explored. With this in mind, this paper raises the question: how can heritage that divides us serve as a foundation for unity? The
theoretical framework of this study is based on a heritological approach, with particular reference to an anthropological perspective and human rights studies, which view heritage as a fluid entity subject to negotiation, translation, and reinterpretation through the interaction of different social narratives. The empirical part of the research is based on a case study conducted within an elective course on Heritage Technologies, carried out in 2024 at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. The focus of the investigation was on cultural mediation and the semantic reinterpretation of heritage in an educational context, with particular emphasis on the role of youth in these processes. Through the analysis of the results, this study demonstrates how contested heritage can be transformed into a common resource, creating space for collective appropriation and symbolic reconstruction of cultural memory, aimed at societal reconciliation.
References
Arraiza, Jose Maria. 2014. “A matter of balance. Cultural heritage, property rights and inter-ethnic relations in Kosovo”. Lecture at Property and Investment in Jus Post Bellum Clarifying Norms, Principles and Practices June 13, 2014, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Banović, B., Milenković, M., & Milenković, M. 2024. “Inclusive intangible cultural heritage safeguarding in museums: professionalism vs. ethnic attribution in a Western Balkan setting.” Museum Management and Curatorship 40(4): 512–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2024.2393157.
Božić Marojević, Milica. 2018. „Nasleđe rata kao baština u miru.“ U Tradicionalno i savremeno u umetnosti i obrazovanju. Cicović-Sarajlić D. i P. Ilić, urednici. Fakultet umetnosti Univerziteta u Prištini, Kosovska Mitrovica.
Божић Маројевић, Милица. 2022. „Памћење спорних легата прошлости или кад култура сећања устукне пред културом поништавања.“ Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини 52 (4): 259–275. doi: 10.5937/zrffp52–38747
Божић Маројевић, Милица. 2023. „Општи поглед на стање и судбину дисонантног културног наслеђа других у Европи и свету.“ У Заштита, очување и афирмација српског културног наслеђа на Косову и Метохији, уредник Д. Војводић. САНУ.
Braun, V. & V. Clarke. 2006. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3: 77–101. COE. 2005. “Faro Convention.” https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/faro-convention.
COE. 2013. „Pravda i pomirenje predugo se čekaju na Balkanu.“ Human Rights Comment. 09.07.2013. https://www.coe.int/bs/web/commissioner/-/justice-and-reconciliation-long-overdue-in-the-balka-1.
Цолић, Мирослав. 2019. „Критичка педагогија Паула Фреиреа.“ Култура полиса, XVI (39), 393–414.
Ćuković, Jelena. 2017. „(Nematerijalno) kulturno nasleđe kao instrument pomirenja i rešavanja kulturnih konflikata.“ Antropologija 17 (3): 45 –56.
Dä tsch, Christiane. 2024. “Common, shared, contradictory heritage? A concept and its dimensions.” In Shared Heritage Revisited, edited by D. Y. Markovich and Christiane Dä tsch. Transcript.
Freire, Paolo. 2002. Pedagogija obespravljenih. Zagreb: Odraz.
Harrison, Rodney. 2010. „What is Heritage?” In Understanding the politics of heritage edited by R. Harisson. Manchester University Press.
Kepeš , Nusreta. 2022. „Servisno uč enje u predš kolskim ustanovama i njegov utjecaj na građanski odgoj djece.“ DHS 1 (18): 487–508.
Lederach, J.P. 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
Macdonald, S. 2013. Memorylands: Heritage and Identity in Europe Today. London: Routledge.
Meskell, L. 2010. “Human rights and heritage ethics.” Anthropological quarterly, 83(4), 839–859.
Mildner, S-A., and Tina Bories, eds. 2024. Reconciliation in the Western Balkans. Aspen Institute.
Moen, Torill. 2006. “Reflections on the Narrative Research Approach.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(4): 56–69.
Petrič uš ić , A. and Cyril Blondel. 2012. “Introduction – Reconciliation in the Western Balkans: New Perspectives and Proposals.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 11, (4): 1–6.
Qiu, Yuheng. (2023). “New Media and Intangible Cultural Heritage.” Communications in Humanities Research 6: 358–364.
Rodwell, D. 2018. “The Historic Urban Landscape and the Geography of Urban Heritage.” The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice 9 (3–4): 180–206.
Shapiro S. 2015. “Towards a Critical Pedagogy of Peace Education [W stronę pedagogiki krytycznej edukacji dla pokoju]”. Kultura – Społeczeń stwo – Edukacja nr 1 (7): 7–20.
UN. 1948. “Universal Declaration on Human Rights.” https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
Vican, D. 1991. „Koncepcija odgoja i obrazovanja Paula Freirea.“ U Napredak, br. 132. (3): 268–295.

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation