SHAOLIN TEMPLE IN THE MIDST OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: TRANSFORMATION OF EVERYDAY LIFE IN A CHINESE MONASTIC COMMUNITY
Keywords:
Shaolin Temple, Covid-19, everyday life, crisis management, ChinaAbstract
This article explores the continuity and transformation that characterized everyday life within the Shaolin Temple amidst the Covid-19 pandemic in China. It reveals the emergent mechanisms that enabled the monastic community to maintain its core religious life during the initial five-month quarantine. The study is based on the data collected during my two-and-a-half-year long anthropological fieldwork in the Temple, which included the period of the outbreak of epidemic and the subsequent isolation. Being caught in the midst of the full quarantine in a Buddhist monastery in China is a unique research experience, which has not been reported in literature. The analysis of the Shaolin Temple case shows that when the socio-cultural transformations jeopardize the reproduction of the core daily life of a relatively closed community, new internal initiatives and mechanisms are produced to safeguard, sustain, and promote the community’s basic means of survival and identity reproduction. The study also shows that the community’s trust in the monastic leadership’s capacity to maintain health safety enables its members to direct their practical consciousness and agency toward sustaining the religious and ontological underpinnings of daily monastic life that are foundational to their communal existence.
References
AlTakarli, Nourah S. 2020. China’s Response to the Covid-19 Outbreak: A Model for Epidemic Preparedness and Management. Dubai Medical Journal 3: 44–48.
Ashiwa, Yoshiko and Wank, David L. 2020. Special Report: COVID-19 Impacts Chinese Buddhism, State Control, and Soft Power. Religion & Diplomacy: A Resource of the Transatlantic Policy Network on Religion and Diplomacy, April 20, 2020. https://religionanddiplomacy.org/2020/04/20/special-report-impact-of-covid-19-on-chinese-buddhism-and-soft-power/
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2013/1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burkitt, Ian. 2004. The time and space of everyday life. Cultural Studies 18(2–3): 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000201491
Cary Wu et al. 2021.Chinese Citizen Satisfaction with Government Performance during COVID-19, Journal of Contemporary China, 30.132: 930–944.
Cheng, Yuan Daniel et al. 2020. Coproducing Responses to Covid-19 with Community-Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China. Public Admin Rev. 80: 866–873. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32836448/
Collins, Randall. 1987. Interaction Ritual Chains, Power and Property: The Micro-Macro Connection as an Empirically Based Theoretical Problem. In: The Micro-Macro Link. Jeffrey Alexander et al. (eds), 193–205. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Čikić, Jovana and Bilinović Rajačić, Ana. 2020. Family practices during the pandemic and the state of emergency – the female perspective. Sociološki pregled 54(3): 799–836.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2020. The Thing that Determines a Country’s Resistance to the Coronavirus. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/thing-determines-how-well-countries-respond-coronavirus/609025/.
Dewalt, Kathleen M. and Dewalt Billie R. 1998. Participant Observation. In: Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Bernard, Russel H. (ed), 259–301. London: Sage Publications.
Gerstein, Dean. 1987. To Unpack Micro and Macro. In: The Micro-Macro Link. Jeffrey Alexander et al. (ed), 86–111. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays of Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon Books.
Goffman, Erving. 1969. Where the Action is: Three Essays. London: Allen Lane/ The Penguin Press.
Handler, Richard. 2012. What’s up, Doctor Goffman? Tell us where the action is! The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(1): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9655.2011.01737.x
Heller, Agneš. 1978/1970. Svakodnevni život [Everyday Life]. Beograd: Nolit.
Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archeology, Art and Architecture. New York: Routledge.
Jacobsen, Michael Hviid and Kristiansen, Soren. 2015. The Social Thought of Erving Goffman. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Li, Yiran et al. 2020. Crisis Coordination and the Role of Social Media in Response to Covid-19 in Wuhan, China. The American Review of Public Administration 50 (6-7). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0275074020942105
Liu, Huaxing and Watson Raine, John. 2016. Why is there less public trust in local government than in central government in China? International Journal of Public Administration 39(4): 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1004090
Lu, Hongjun. 2001. Songshan Shaolin si [Shaolin Monastery of Mount Song]. Zhengzhou: Henan renmin chuban she.
Lu, Zhouxiang. 2019. A History of Shaolin: Buddhism, Kung Fu and Identity. Routledge Studies in Cultural History. Routledge.
Martin, Bernice. 1984. Mother wouldn’t like it: Housework as magic. Theory, Culture and Society 292: 19–36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/651165
Miao, Qing et al. 2020. Responding to Covid-19: Community Volunteerism and Coproduction in China. World Development 137, 105128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105128
Mittelstaedt, Jean Christopher. 2021. Rebuilding Authority: The Party’s Relationship with Its Grassroots Organizations’. The China Quarterly 248: S1: 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000746
Morgan, Jo. 2011. Čitanje svakodnevice [Reading Everyday Life]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Nan, Ouyang. 2020. How is Chinese Buddhism Coping with the Covid-19 Pandemic? Asia Research Institute. National University of Singapore. https://ari.nus.edu.sg/20331–3/
Nešković, Marta. 2017. Odnos države i budističke zajednice u savremenoj Kini [The Relationship Between the State and the Buddhist Community in Modern China], Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology 12(3): 905–933.
Nešković, Marta. 2020. Intercultural Pedagogies: Experiencing the Kungfu Teaching Methods at the Shaolin Temple. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 4. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257–020–00040–3
Ning, Yan et al. 2020. China’s model to-combat the COVID-19 epidemic: A public health emergency governance approach. Global Health Research and Policy 5(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256–020–00161–4
Ortiz-Ospina, Esteban. 2016. Trust. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/trust
Pajvančić, Marijana, Petrušić Nevena, Nikolin Sanja, Vladisavljević Aleksandra, Baćanović, Višnja. 2020. Rodna analiza odgovora na COVID-19 u Republici Srbiji. Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji i Ženska platfoma za razvoj Srbije 2014–2020. https://www.fenomena.org/covid19-resursi-za-nvo/rodna-analiza-odgovora-na-covid19-u-republici-srbiji
Pavlović, Aleksandar. 2016. Svakodnevni život stanovnika Severne Kosovske Mitrovice [The Everyday Life of the Northern Kosovska Mitrovica Residents]. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade.
Ristić, Dušan, Pajvančić-Cizelj Ana, and Čikić Jovana. 2020. COVID-19 in Everyday Life: Contextualizing the Pandemic. Sociologija 62(4): 524–548. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC2004524R
Samudra, Jaida Kim. 2008. Memory in Our Body: Thick Participation and the Translationof Kinesthetic Experience. American Ethnologist 35(4): 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548–1425.2008.00104.x
Shahar, Meir. 2008. Shaolin Monastery: History, Religion and the Chinese Martial Arts. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Shi, Yongxin, 2013. Shaolin Temple in my Heart. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
Shi, Yongxin. 2014. Shaolin Gongfu. Beijing: Jin cheng chubanshe. English edition: Shi Yongxin. 2020. Shaolin Kungfu (translated by Ma Lianzhen and Wang Qiong). Beijing: Lighthouse Publishing and People & Tangel Publishing House.
Siegrist, Michael and Zingg, Alexandra. 2014. The Role of Public Trust During Pandemics: Implications for Crisis Communication. European Psychologist 19(1): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016–9040/a000169
Sier, Willy. 2021. The Politics of Care During COVID-19: The Visibility of Anti-Virus Measures in Wuhan. China Information 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X211032370
Spasić, Ivana. 2004. Sociologija svakodnevnog života [Sociology of Everyday Life]. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Sulima, Roh. 2005. Antropologija svakodnevice [Anthropology of Everyday Life]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.
Tian, Huaiyu et al. 2020. An Investigation of Transmission Control Measures during the First 50 Days of the Covid-19 Epidemic in China. Science 368 (8 May 2020): 638–642. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abb6105
Vučinić Nešković, Vesna. 2008. Božić u Boki Kotorskoj [Christmas in the Bay of Kotor]. Belgrade: Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade.
Vučinić Nešković, Vesna. 2013. Metodologija terenskog istraživanja u antropologiji: od normativnog do iskustvenog [Methodology of Anthropological Fieldwork: From the Normative to the Experiential]. Belgrade: Serbian Genealogical Center and Faculty of Philosophy University of Belgrade.
Wilber, Ken. 1998. The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion. New York (NY): Harmony.
Yang, Zhenjie et al. 2021. Services and Surveillance during the Pandemic Lockdown: Residents’ Committees in Wuhan and Beijing. China Information 35: 420–440. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0920203X211012822
Yifa. 2002. The Origins of Buddhist Monastic Codes in China: An Annotated Translation and Study of the Chanyuan qinggui. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Zen Classics: Formative Texts in the History of Zen Buddhism. 2005. Edited by Steven Heine and Dale S. Wright, 15–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhao, Ting and Wu, Zhongsheng. 2020. Citizen–State Collaboration in Combating Covid-19 in China: Experiences and Lessons from the Perspective of Co-Production. The American Review of Public Administration 50: 777–783. https://doi. org/10.1177/0275074020942

ERIH PLUS - European Reference Index for the Humanities
CEEOL - Central and Eastern European Online Library
The DOI Foundation